We discuss the shift to prehospital blood to treat shock sooner.
Hosts:
Nichole Bosson, MD, MPH, FACEP
Avir Mitra, MD
Show Notes
Core EM Modular CME Course
Maximize your commute with the new Core EM Modular CME Course, featuring the most essential content distilled from our top-rated podcast episodes. This course offers 12 audio-based modules packed with pearls! Information and link below.
Course Highlights:
- Credit: 12.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™
- Curriculum: Comprehensive coverage of Core Emergency Medicine, with 12 modules spanning from Critical Care to Pediatrics.
- Cost:
- Free for NYU Learners
- $250 for Non-NYU Learners
Click Here to Register and Begin Module 1
What is prehospital blood transfusion
Administration of blood products in the field prior to hospital arrival
Aimed at patients in hemorrhagic shock
Why this matters
Traditional US prehospital resuscitation relied on crystalloid
ED and trauma care now prioritize early blood
Hemorrhage occurs before hospital arrival
Delays to definitive hemorrhage control are common
Earlier blood may improve survival
Supporting rationale
ATLS and trauma paradigms emphasize blood over fluid
National organizations support prehospital blood when feasible
EMS already manages high risk, time sensitive interventions
Evidence overview
Data are mixed and evolving
COMBAT: no benefit
PAMPer: mortality benefit
RePHILL: no clear benefit
Signal toward benefit when transport time exceeds ~20 minutes
Urban systems still experience long delays due to traffic and geography
LA County median time to in hospital transfusion ~35 minutes
LA County program
~2 years of planning before launch
Pilot began April 1
Partnerships:
LA County Fire
Compton Fire
Local trauma centers
San Diego Blood Bank
14 units of blood circulating in the field
Blood rotated back 14 days before expiration
Ultimately used at Harbor UCLA
Continuous temperature and safety monitoring
Indications used in LA County
Focused rollout
Trauma related hemorrhagic shock
Postpartum hemorrhage
Physiologic criteria:
SBP < 70
Or HR > 110 with SBP < 90
Shock index ≥ 1.2
Witnessed traumatic cardiac arrest
Products:
One unit whole blood preferred
Two units PRBCs if whole blood unavailable
Early experience
~28 patients transfused at time of discussion
Evaluating:
Indications
Protocol adherence
Time to transfusion
Early outcomes
Too early for outcome conclusions
California collaboration
Multiple active programs:
Riverside (Corona Fire)
LA County
Ventura County
Additional programs planned:
Sacramento
San Bernardino
Programs meet monthly as CalDROP
Focus on shared learning and operational optimization
Barriers and concerns
Trauma surgeon concerns about blood supply
Need for system wide buy in
Community engagement
Patients who may decline transfusion
Women of childbearing age and alloimmunization risk
Risk of HDFN is extremely low
Clear communication with receiving hospitals is essential
Future direction
Rapid national expansion expected
Greatest benefit likely where transport delays exist
Prehospital Blood Transfusion Coalition active nationally
Major unresolved issue: reimbursement
Currently funded largely by fire departments
Sustainability depends on policy and payment reform
Take-Home Points
Hemorrhagic shock is best treated with blood, not crystalloid
Prehospital transfusion may benefit patients with prolonged transport times
Implementation requires strong partnerships with blood banks and trauma centers
Early data are promising, but patient selection remains critical
National collaboration is key to sustainability and future growth
Read More
